<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The System 301: Future Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/2009/11/12/the-system-301-future-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/2009/11/12/the-system-301-future-words/</link>
	<description>Comics will be posted until morale improves.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chibby</title>
		<link>http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/2009/11/12/the-system-301-future-words/comment-page-1/#comment-3211</link>
		<dc:creator>Chibby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/?p=2059#comment-3211</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s only ungood for the unparty people. the party people already think it&#039;s doubleplusgood. Ingsoc ftw! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s only ungood for the unparty people. the party people already think it&#039;s doubleplusgood. Ingsoc ftw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPie</title>
		<link>http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/2009/11/12/the-system-301-future-words/comment-page-1/#comment-3210</link>
		<dc:creator>iPie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/?p=2059#comment-3210</guid>
		<description>It sounds like the future needs to enact useful languages like Newspeak to limit its numerous words. At first it is ungood, but after a while is doubleplusgood. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like the future needs to enact useful languages like Newspeak to limit its numerous words. At first it is ungood, but after a while is doubleplusgood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rossmom</title>
		<link>http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/2009/11/12/the-system-301-future-words/comment-page-1/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator>Rossmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/?p=2059#comment-3209</guid>
		<description>I think tripling meanings is a good idea.  Perhaps though, it would be better to have the word indicate the meanings or the dictionary would be impossible to negotiate (not that 1/2 the words now are in the dictionary). 
 
So how about hamsqlel for hamburger/squirrel/falafel.  Yeah, I admit you would need to learn new pronunciation guidelines, but it would save on defining words. 
 
Think about it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think tripling meanings is a good idea.  Perhaps though, it would be better to have the word indicate the meanings or the dictionary would be impossible to negotiate (not that 1/2 the words now are in the dictionary). </p>
<p>So how about hamsqlel for hamburger/squirrel/falafel.  Yeah, I admit you would need to learn new pronunciation guidelines, but it would save on defining words. </p>
<p>Think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wizard</title>
		<link>http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/2009/11/12/the-system-301-future-words/comment-page-1/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>Wizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/?p=2059#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>Ah, very different from our present-day language. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, very different from our present-day language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
